37dc9a476a
Similar to what native and staging is doing since: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/native.bbclass?id=d6c7b9f4f0e61fa6546d3644e27abe3e96f597e2 https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/staging.bbclass?id=1cf62882bbac543960e4815d117ffce0e53bda07 Cross task outputs can call native dependencies and even when cross recipe output doesn't change it might produce different results when the called native dependency is changed, e.g. clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} contains symlink to clang binary from clang-native, but when clang-native outhash is changed, clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} will still be considered equivalent and target recipes aren't rebuilt with new clang binary, see work around in https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/pull/1140 to make target recipes to depend directly not only on clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} but clang-native as well. I have added a small testcase in meta-selftest which demostrates this issue. Not included in this change, but will send it if useful. openembedded-core $ ls -1 meta-selftest/recipes-devtools/hashequiv-test/ print-datetime-link-cross.bb print-datetime-link-native.bb print-datetime-native.bb print-datetime-usecross.bb print-datetime-usenative.bb print-datetime-native provides script which prints defined PRINT_DATETIME variable. print-datetime-link-native and print-datetime-link-cross both provide a symlink to the script from print-datetime-native. print-datetime-usenative and print-datetime-usecross are target recipes using the native and cross versions of print-datetime-link-* recipe. # clean build all is rebuilt: $ bitbake -k print-datetime-usenative print-datetime-usecross WARNING: print-datetime-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-native current DATETIME in script is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-link-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-native current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-usenative-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usenative current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-usecross-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usecross current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_05 # keep sstate-cache and hashserv.db: # print-datetime-usenative is correctly rebuilt, because print-datetime-link-native has different hash (because print-datetime-native hash changed) # print-datetime-usecross wasn't rebuilt, because print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 doesn't include the changed hash of print-datetime-native $ bitbake -k print-datetime-usenative print-datetime-usecross WARNING: print-datetime-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-native current DATETIME in script is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-link-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-native current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-usenative-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usenative current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_07 It's because print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 depsig doesn't include print-datetime-native signature: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64:x86_64-oe-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 32 19fbeb373f781c2504453c1ca04dab018a7bc8388c87f4bbc59589df31523d07 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/print-datetime-link -> ../print-datetime While print-datetime-link-native doesn't have this issue, because print-datetime-native signature is there: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-native/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 print-datetime-native: 60f2734a63d708489570ca719413b4662f8368abc9f4760a279a0a5481e4a17b quilt-native: 65d78a7a5b5cbbf0969798efe558ca28e7ef058f4232fcff266912d16f67a8b8 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-native:x86_64-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 26 3d5458be834b2d0e4c65466b9b877d6028ae2210a56399284a23144818666f10 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/print-datetime-link -> print-datetime With the cross.bbclass fix the link-cross recipe has a checksum from native recipe as well: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 print-datetime-native: 9ceb6c27342eae6b8da86c84685af38fb8927ccc19979aae75b8b1e444b11c5c quilt-native: 65d78a7a5b5cbbf0969798efe558ca28e7ef058f4232fcff266912d16f67a8b8 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64:x86_64-oe-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 32 19fbeb373f781c2504453c1ca04dab018a7bc8388c87f4bbc59589df31523d07 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/print-datetime-link -> ../print-datetime And print-datetime-usecross is correctly rebuilt whenever print-datetime-native output is different. (From OE-Core rev: c15faee8854e85e02693a041d88326f30b24ee92) Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| bitbake | ||
| contrib | ||
| documentation | ||
| meta | ||
| meta-poky | ||
| meta-selftest | ||
| meta-skeleton | ||
| meta-yocto-bsp | ||
| scripts | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .templateconf | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| LICENSE.GPL-2.0-only | ||
| LICENSE.MIT | ||
| MAINTAINERS.md | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MEMORIAM | ||
| oe-init-build-env | ||
| README.hardware.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| README.OE-Core.md | ||
| README.poky.md | ||
| README.qemu.md | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
Poky
Poky is an integration of various components to form a pre-packaged build system and development environment which is used as a development and validation tool by the Yocto Project. It features support for building customised embedded style device images and custom containers. There are reference demo images ranging from X11/GTK+ to Weston, commandline and more. The system supports cross-architecture application development using QEMU emulation and a standalone toolchain and SDK suitable for IDE integration.
Additional information on the specifics of hardware that Poky supports is available in README.hardware. Further hardware support can easily be added in the form of BSP layers which extend the systems capabilities in a modular way. Many layers are available and can be found through the layer index.
As an integration layer Poky consists of several upstream projects such as BitBake, OpenEmbedded-Core, Yocto documentation, the 'meta-yocto' layer which has configuration and hardware support components. These components are all part of the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded ecosystems.
The Yocto Project has extensive documentation about the system including a reference manual which can be found at https://docs.yoctoproject.org/
OpenEmbedded is the build architecture used by Poky and the Yocto project. For information about OpenEmbedded, see the OpenEmbedded website.
Contribution Guidelines
The project works using a mailing list patch submission process. Patches should be sent to the mailing list for the repository the components originate from (see below). Throughout the Yocto Project, the README files in the component in question should detail where to send patches, who the maintainers are and where bugs should be reported.
A guide to submitting patches to OpenEmbedded is available at:
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded
There is good documentation on how to write/format patches at:
https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Where to Send Patches
As Poky is an integration repository (built using a tool called combo-layer), patches against the various components should be sent to their respective upstreams:
OpenEmbedded-Core (files in meta/, meta-selftest/, meta-skeleton/, scripts/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/
- Mailing list: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
BitBake (files in bitbake/):
- Git repository: https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/
- Mailing list: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Documentation (files in documentation/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-docs/
- Mailing list: docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
meta-yocto (files in meta-poky/, meta-yocto-bsp/):
- Git repository: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-yocto
- Mailing list: poky@lists.yoctoproject.org
If in doubt, check the openembedded-core git repository for the content you intend to modify as most files are from there unless clearly one of the above categories. Before sending, be sure the patches apply cleanly to the current git repository branch in question.